The Fat Map

Americans have lower life expectancy, higher infant mortality, and are generally sicker than citizens of other countries despite spending twice as much on healthcare. Confronted with this fact some of us, observing that all other countries have universal healthcare, start thinking that universal healthcare might help this country too.

Not so fast says Greg Mankiw, economic adviser to Mitt Romney. The other day he blamed the relatively poor health care numbers in the US on, among other things, obesity. The US doesn’t really have an overall lower life expectancy, he says, if you adjust for how fat Americans are. So don’t blame the healthcare system.

He may be right. But if so, it strongly argues for charging fat people (or as Mankiw puts it, people who have made that “lifestyle choice”) more for their healthcare.

Being a fuzzy headed liberal I tend to favor community rating, charging everyone the same premium regardless—but I can see a case for “risk adjusting” premiums for, say, obesity and smoking.

But, politically, I’m not sure Mankiw and Romney really want to make this their campaign theme: “don’t worry about healthcare because we will just charge higher premiums to fat people until they slim down and get healthier”. Particularly when you take a look at the map. Here is a ranking of states with the highest percentage of obese people. Kind of matches a certain political map I’m thinking of.

1: Mississippi*
2: Alabama
3: West Virginia
4: Louisiana*
5: Kentucky*
6: Tennessee
7: Arkansas*
8 (tie): Indiana*, South Carolina*
10: Texas
11: Michigan
12: Georgia*
13: Oklahoma*
14: Missouri*
15 (tie): Ohio*, Alaska
17: North Carolina*
18: North Dakota
19: Pennsylvania*
20: Nebraska*
21: Iowa
22: South Dakota*
23: Illinois*
24: Maryland*
25: Virginia
26: Kansas
27: Minnesota
28: Wisconsin*
29: Delaware*
30 California*
31 (tie): Idaho*, Washington*
33: Oregon*
34: Maine
35: Florida*
36 (tie): Wyoming*, New Hampshire*, New York
39: D.C.
40 (tie): New Jersey*, New Mexico*
42: Nevada
43 (tie): Arizona, Utah*
45: Montana
46: Connecticut*
47 (tie): Rhode Island*, Vermont
49: Massachusetts*
50: Hawaii
51: Colorado.


Leave a comment

Filed under elections 08, healthcare finance

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s